| Asylum
Surgery |
| Immigrants |
| Asylum
Crackdown |
RACIAL
HARMONY
This Government and the politically correct
establishment have created a ludicrous situation
where living in harmony with ethnic minorities
will become an impossibility. In the first
instance, there are far too many refugees still
being allowed into this already overpopulated
island. They are given quality housing, health
and education facilities, plus generous benefits,
while we English citizens, born and bred here,
have to suffer continuing deterioration of the
National Health Service, education, care for the
elderly and the breakdown of public services,
thus causing anger and resentment regarding the
preferential treatment of asylum seekers.
The idea of Britain being a multi-cultural
society has served only to dilute our sovereignty
and our national identitity. As Britons, we have
our own culture, society, language and lifestyle.
This culture has been developed over centuries of
struggle, trials and victories by many men and
women who have sought freedom. We speak English,
not Urdu, Hindu, Arabic, Chinese or any other
language, and we really do not care how they did
things where they came from. We are happy with
our culture and we have no desire to change to
suit the ethnic minorities. This is our country
and our laws give every citizen the right to
express his opinion. We were never consulted or
given that right on whether or not we wished to
integrate, but I have no doubt that the results
of the next election will reflect those views. Mrs
J. Capenerhurst |
|
|
ASYLUM SEEKERS
The Government has announced it will stop
sending asylum seekers to Derby - at least for the time
being. The National Asylum Support Service (NASS), the
Government agency that houses asylum seekers while they
await the outcome of their residency applications, has
called a temporary halt to its dispersal scheme. The move
comes after Derby City Council lobbied NASS to stop
sending people to the city. Currently, NASS is supporting
1,367 people in Derby - 217 more than the city should
have, according to the agency's own guidelines of placing
one asylum seeker per 200 of the existing population -
which is around 230,000.
The Lib Dem-Tory alliance, which took control of the
council in May, says the number of asylum seekers is
causing a "serious strain" on housing and
health services and that the city cannot cope with a
continued influx of asylum seekers. Tory Philip Hickson,
council deputy leader, said, "I shall continue to
campaign against any more asylum seekers being dispersed
in this city. My view is, and always has been, that the
policy of introducing large numbers of asylum seekers,
which cannot be properly supported, has been a disaster,
and I'm glad to see it come to an end."
A few weeks earlier, a
petition was handed in to the city council by members of
the Asian community of Normanton calling for the council
to take action over tensions caused by Iraqi asylum
seekers. They claimed that "the asylum seekers
should not have been placed in what is a 'majority' Asian
community," adding, "this has caused problems
because they don't seem to fit in with Western
culture." This decision to stop sending asylum seekers here
wouldn't have anything to do with the petition, would it?
The Government was accused of
"secretly" sending asylum seekers to Derby
without informing the city council. Council deputy leader
Philip Hickson was outraged. He said it was "highly
unethical" of the Government. "We would expect
that if there were any changes to the arrangements, they
would have to consult with us. They haven't done that. If
some sort of dispersal has been arranged, it's certainly
a matter we'll take up with NASS and we'll get MPs
involved. We wouldn't expect a Government department to
under-handedly resume any dispersal."
Mr Hickson estimates there are more than 3,000 refugees
in Derby, plus at least 1,500 illegal immigrants.
Official figures show there are 1,096 asylum seekers in
Derby. David Callow, Derby Voluntary Sector Refugee Forum
chairman, which helps asylum seekers and refugees, said
most were single working men in private rented
accommodation, who would not receive housing waiting list
priority. He added, "There's a lot of negativity
from people who assume they're drains on society."
Council leaders said they have had assurances that no
asylum seekers have been sent to the city since September
2003 saying they would be very unhappy if the Home
Office's promises turned out to be misleading. Mr Hickson
said, "I will be more than disappointed, I shall be
furious. We had an agreement that dispersal to the city
would cease. There has been no agreement that it could
resume and the council's policy is that it should not
resume."
Bill Jeffrey, the head of the Home Office's immigration
and nationality directorate, admitted that the Government
got it wrong. In a statement, he said, "There has
been no dispersal of asylum seekers to Derby since
September, 2003, and dispersal to Derby remains
suspended. We would not restart dispersing asylum seekers
to Derby without consulting fully with Derby City Council
and other local partners, to ensure that the needs of the
community were taken into account."
Mr Hickson said, "It's an absolute disgrace, an
illustration of what a shambles asylum policy is - the
right hand does not know what the left hand is doing. I
want to reassure people that dispersal will not resume,
and the Home Office has now confirmed that dispersal
would also not resume, without the city council's
knowledge and agreement."
The number of asylum seekers pouring into
Derby has been blamed for a mounting housing crisis. The
number of people registered homeless has rocketed in the
past year whilst the number of homes has plummeted. There
are currently 517 people registered homeless in the city
but just 38 council houses available. In contrast,
figures for April last year show there were 187 people
needing housing who then had a choice of 181 homes.
Councillor Hickson, who is responsible for housing, said
the influx of asylum seekers over the last few years has
been to blame.
Mr Hickson believes the situation is only going to get
worse. He said, "The amount of refugees is putting a
huge strain on the housing, GP and education systems. In
Derby there are more people than available
resources.There is a problem and there is no immediate
solution and it is only going to get worse. Once their
asylum application is approved they become resident in
the city and the council has a duty to house them. The
only solution would be to build hundreds of houses, but
that's not going to happen as we've not been budgeted for
building and we don't have the land in the city."
It was in the late 1990s that asylum seekers started
flocking to Derby in the aftermath of the Kosovo war and
official city council figures indicate that there are now
1,800 asylum seekers in Derby. Despite Home Office claims
to the contrary, the Derby council taxpayer is footing
the bill and financial resources that have already been
under pressure are being stretched to the limit, causing
a funding crisis for the Council, who are to seek
emergency funding from Central Government.
Lib Dem Maurice Burgess, leader of the city council,
said, "As soon as the asylum seeker is given
permission to stay in the local authority area, it's our
responsibility to house them, but we only have a limited
number of properties. This is a problem that's been swept
under the carpet by the previous Labour council."
Officially Derby is the 12th largest recipient in the UK
of asylum applicants, but in terms of population size is
not even in the top 20.
The government denied that Derby takes three times the
national average of asylum seekers, despite city council
figures which show otherwise. The statistics highlight an
asylum population in the city of between 1,500 and 2,000,
which compares to an average of around 550. Home Office
Minister Fiona MacTaggart said the city was no different
to other places.
Next >>>--
|