ABUSE OF POWER
Police conducted a three-year operation
in secret to try to identify journalist's
sources, which must have cost taxpayers several
hundred thousand pounds. Thames Valley officers
set up Operation Virid from private offices in
Pangbourne, Berkshire, to investigate Reading
based news agency INS.
They obtained court orders
to to seize the agency's phone records which
revealed who its journalists had spoken to. Court
applications were in private and INS was not told
its records were being sought.
INS went to court to demand its records back,
claiming warrants under which they were obtained
were illegal. Thames Valley chief constable Peter
Neyroud was due to appear at the High Court but
the force agreed to settle the dispute and pay
INS's legal costs, estimated at £50,000.
INS
boss, Neil Hyde, said the secret seizure of his
records 'smacked of Big Brother' and added,
"We were determined to thwart this
interference in the basic rights of a free
Press." Thames Valley police declined to
comment. |
|
|
BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING...
By Maxine
Frith
More than four million surveillance cameras monitor our
every move, making Britain the most-watched nation in the
world. The number of closed circuit television (CCTV)
cameras has quadrupled in the past three years, and there
is now one for every 14 people in the UK. The increase is
happening at twice the predicted rate, and it is believed
that Britain accounts for one-fifth of all CCTV cameras
worldwide. Estimates suggest that residents of a city
such as London can each expect to be captured on CCTV
cameras up to 300 times a day, and much of the filming
breaches existing data guidelines. Civil liberties groups
complain that the rules governing the use of the cameras
in Britain are the most lax in the world. They say that,
in contrast to other countries, members of the public are
often unaware they are being filmed, and are usually
ignorant of the relevant regulations. They also argue
that there is little evidence to support the contention
that CCTV cameras lead to a reduction in crime rates.
Barry Hugill, a spokesman for the human rights and civil
liberties organisation Liberty, said, "This
proliferation of cameras is simply astounding. The use of
CCTV has just exploded in the last few years, and what is
terrifying is that we are alone in the world for not even
having a debate about what it means for our
privacy." Professor Clive Norris, deputy director of
the Centre for Criminological Research in Sheffield,
presented the new research at an international conference
on CCTV at Sheffield University. Professor Norris
conducted a study in 2001 which predicted that the number
of cameras would double from one million to two million
by 2004. But his most recent study concludes that there
are now "at least" 4,285,000 cameras in
operation - double his earlier prediction. There are no
official government figures for the number of CCTV
systems in Britain, but Professor Norris used a detailed
study of surveillance cameras in London to calculate his
figure.
The research formed part of a European-wide URBANEYE
project on the use of CCTV. Professor Norris said,
"We are the most-watched nation in the world. One of
the surprising findings was how much more control there
is in other countries, such as America and France,
compared to Britain. Other countries have been much more
wary about CCTV, because of long-held concepts such as
freedom of expression and assembly. These seem to be
alien concepts in here." The use of cameras to film
people in the street is banned in Germany, Canada and
several other countries. But it is accepted practice in
Britain, which is alone in not having a privacy law that
protects people against constant surveillance. The Data
Protection Act states that the public has to be informed
that CCTV systems are in operation, and be told how they
can exercise their legal right to see their own footage.
But civil rights groups said many councils, shops and
businesses were failing to provide this information, and
they estimated that up to 70% of CCTV camera operators
were breaking the rules. Some shopping-centre security
guards use the cameras to track "socially
undesirable" people, such as groups of teenage boys
or rough sleepers, around stores, and then eject them
even if they have done nothing wrong. Professor Norris
warned, "The use of these practices represents a
shift from formal and legally regulated measures of crime
control towards private and unaccountable
justice."Footage from the cameras has also been
passed to newspapers and television companies without
people's permission.
Professor Norris said, "CCTV is generally seen as
benign rather than as Big Brother-style surveillance. We
need to have a much wider debate about exactly what CCTV
is doing in terms of our privacy and our society. It is
about much more than crime. It enables people to be
tracked and monitored and harassed and socially excluded
on the basis that they do not fit into the category of
people that a council or shopping centre wants to see in
a public space." Over the past decade, the Home
Office has handed out millions of pounds in grants to
police forces and councils to install CCTV systems in the
belief it will reduce and prevent crime. But Mr Hugill
said, "All that CCTV does is shift the crime to
another area for a bit, and then it returns. If you asked
most people, they would rather see the Government
spending the money on more police officers than on
installing cameras, which do not appear to make much
difference anyway."
Next
>>>
|