NO DIFFERENCE
The year 2003 has ended in sadly predictable
fashion when it comes to what passes for law and
order in this country. If further evidence were
needed that the "lunatics have taken over
the asylum", this was provided by two
incidents.
One was the murder of a police officer
in Leeds. The other was the news that a convicted
drugs smuggler, also implicated in a murder, was
moved to an open prison having served only six
years of a 21-year sentence.
He has now absconded, as have some 90 or so
so-called prisoners from the same open prison in
the last 12 months. BBC Radio Four's Today
programme invited the Home Office to comment on
this. Surprise, surprise - no-one was available.
I would like to challenge our local politicians -
Margaret Beckett, Judy Mallaber, Bob Laxton, Liz
Blackman, Mark Todd and Patrick McLoughlin - to
explain to law-abiding members of society how
this state of affairs can exist in a country
which is supposedly governed by the rule of law.
The reality seems to be that we are governed by
politicians who clearly do not either listen to
the voters or care what voters think about the
inexorable rise of crime and violence in society.
In June, there will be elections to the EU
and, since most of our laws are these days made
in Brussels, it might help would-be voters to
make up their minds about whether it is worth
participating in the electoral process or not. Richard
Clark |
|
|
VOTING
Nothing
frightens councillors as much as a low turnout. However
badly they behave, they need to feel that the public
supports the system. None of the main parties really
deserves our votes.
* Labour
despises the voters and parliament. They market
themselves ruthlessly, irrespective of the truth.
* The
Conservatives are quite prepared to run down our
public services still further in pursuit of electoral
advantage.
* The Liberal
Democrats are the cuddly party, who think that being
nice to everyone will bring about a happier world.
All the
parties wimp out of realistic discussion of serious
issues likes drugs, or euthanasia. So do we vote for the
least bad party, or do we show our contempt for them all
by staying away? Councillors claim to deplore apathy.
This is not because of some high minded dedication to the
democratic process (our democracy is feeble anyway). Like
most things councillors say, it is a selfish means to
their end, which is a good election result. Abstention
tells them they just have not been doing well enough for
any of them to deserve your vote. If you vote, you buy
into their system. More importantly, it shows you accept
their standards. Abstention may show antipathy to the lot
of them.
Lining up
at polling stations to place votes in a ballot box at
elections may soon become a thing of the past in Derby.
Instead, residents in the city could be asked to elect
councillors by putting their vote in the post at their
own convenience - but only if the voters say that is what
they want to do. Recent figures show that fewer people
are making the effort to vote at local elections. The
turnout for this year's local elections in May was 30.6%,
which was 2.7% lower than 2002.
Now, in a bid to encourage more people to vote, Derby
City Council's scrutiny management commission is
considering carrying out a survey to see what people in
Derby think about all-postal voting. The commission is
expected to give the go-ahead to proposals to pay an
independent consultant £4,000 to conduct 500 telephone
interviews to establish the public's views. The move
comes as part of a drive by the Electoral Commission,
which local promotes democracy, to encourage all local
authority elections to be carried out this way.
A number of people in Derby have already tried voting by
post. In 2002, 6,000 people applied for a postal vote and
in May this year that figure rose to more than 12,000 out
of a total of 166,000 people eligible to vote. Councillor
Richard Smalley, chairman of the scrutiny management
commission, said, "Research has shown that there's
an increase when postal voting is used. However, the
research that's been done so far shows that it wouldn't
really encourage people who are already disaffected by
the democratic process. We need to find a way to
re-engage the population and get them involved."
In 2001, the council tested opinion on different ways of
voting through the Derby Pointer Panel, which is used as
a sounding board on policy issues and is designed to
accurately reflect how people in the city feel about a
range of topics. The survey showed the public thought
more people would vote if they could do so on the
internet, vote on more than one day and if there were
polling stations in supermarkets. MORI recently carried
out a survey of the local authorities which carried out
pilot schemes of all-postal votes in May, which included
East Staffordshire and Chesterfield.
The
British National Party is to fight for seats on Derby
City Council for the first time and the move has appalled
members of the city council, who claim the BNP is racist
and will not gain any support in Derby. Conservative
deputy city council leader Philip Hickson viewed the
BNP's intentions for Derby with "horror"
saying, "It's a racist party completely at odds with
mainstream political activity and there's absolutely no
hope for it in Derby."
Councillor Chris Williamson, the council's Labour group
leader, added, "What the BNP has attempted to do in
recent years is give a veneer of respectability. But the
reality of its policies is outside what people in Derby
would have any support for. Derby is a very tolerant city
and I don't think it would have any truck with a vile
right-wing party like this."
Derbyshire BNP
organiser Sadie Graham said, "We're planning to
field a number of candidates right across Derby and Amber
Valley. We're not racist, all we're doing is standing up
for the rights and wishes of British people who need a
voice."
|