Common Market Referendum 1974

 A message from the Prime Minister

 The time has come when Britain has to make the choice whether or not to join the European Community. It will be a historic decision. And before Parliament comes to take it I am certain that there should be, throughout the nation, the widest possible discussion and understanding of what is involved.

 I hope that this short version of the Government's White Paper will help to explain the major issues. It records the results of the successful negotiations between Britain and the Six, and sets out the difficulties as well as the opportunities of joining.

 Finally, it explains why the Government firmly believes that the terms for British entry into the European Community are fair and reasonable.

The Choice

 Security

Will our security be better served by joining the European Community than by not doing so? No Government in these islands has been able to ignore for more than a short time, or without disastrous consequences, the course of events on the continent of Europe. Whatever the future holds, our security and that of Western Europe will remain interlocked.

Prosperity

 Will we be able to manufacture and trade more favourably if we join the European Community than if we do not? The strength and prosperity of Britain depend partly on our efforts as a people and partly on economic conditions in the world outside. The conditions under which we manufacture and trade are of vital national interest to us.

 

If we say "No"

 A decision not to join would be a reversal of the whole direction of British policy under successive governments, Conservative and Labour. No other grouping of countries which has been proposed is acceptable to the nations concerned. In a single generation we should have rejected an Imperial past and a European future, and we would have found nothing to put in their place.

 The Government's decision

 Her Majesty's Government is convinced that our country will be more secure and our people and our industries more prosperous if we join the European Community than if we remain outside. It will therefore seek the approval of Parliament in the autumn for a decision in principle that Britain should join the Community on 1 January 1973 on the terms which have been negotiated.

 The Six and Ourselves

 The Communities develop

After the war the countries of Western Europe felt the need for closer co-operation among themselves. They wanted to prevent future wars between each other and to replace their economic rivalry with more constructive co-operation.

This deeply felt need for closer co-operation led to the creation of the Brussels Treaty Organisation (later known as the Western European Union), the Council of Europe and the Organisation for European Economic Co-operation (now the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Britain is a member of all these organisations.

But the Six felt the need to go further. In 1951 the European Coal and Steel Community was set up. Then in 1957 the European Economic Community and Euratom were founded by France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Holland and Luxembourg.

How they work

The Economic Community was set up by the Treaty of Rome. The main objectives of this treaty were to promote an ever closer union among European peoples, to ensure economic and social progress by eliminating the barriers which divide Europe, and to improve the living and working conditions of its peoples. Restrictions on trade were to be abolished and the prosperity of their former colonial territories developed. The Six each retained their own national institutions and national identities.

Despite severe strains imposed on them in these early days the prosperity of the Six has increased impressively and their influence in the economic councils of the world has grown. The Interests of each member state have been preserved, as well as the interest of the Community as a whole. Today there is no significant body of opinion inside the Six which opposes the Community idea.

Why Britain stayed out

Britain took part in some of Europe's co-operative ventures after the war, particularly in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. But we had suffered less disastrously from the war than most of the other European nations: we did not, for instance, suffer the shock of invasion. At the same time we were pre-occupied with the changes in our relationships with the countries of the Commonwealth.

So we were less immediately conscious of the need for unity in Europe. We were not ready to go as far and as fast as the others. In fact, in the early 1950s we would have been welcomed as partners by all the Six countries, and the reserves of economic strength with which we emerged from the war would have given us a leading position.  

(Click on image to enlarge.)            

It was only later in the 1 950s that the change in our position in the world became     increasingly obvious. We had repeated economic crises and balance of payments         difficulties at home; overseas our colonies were achieving independence. We began to sense that our influence in world councils had diminished.

Britain applies to join

By 1960 the desire to share more closely in the economic and industrial development of Europe had become powerful. And so in 1 961 the Conservative Government decided to apply for negotiations to see whether satisfactory arrangements could be made to meet the needs of Britain, the Commonwealth, and those European countries not in the European Economic Community who had formed the European Free Trade Association.

Together with Norway, Denmark and the Irish Republic, who have all expressed an interest in joining at the same time as Britain the Six would become a Community of Ten with a population of 255 million.  

(Click on image to enlarge)

The size of the enlarged Community including Britain

The Conservative Government in 1961 stated that the decision to apply was reached "not on any narrow or short-term grounds but as a thorough assessment over a considerable period of the needs of our country, of Europe and of the Free World as a whole. We desire to become full, whole-hearted and active members of the European Community and to go forward with you in the building of a new Europe".

The Labour Government in 1967 renewed Britain's application for membership of the Community. It spoke of "the long-term potential for Europe and therefore for Britain of the creation of a single market approaching 300 million people, with all the scope and incentive which this will provide for British industry, and of the enormous possibilities which an integrated strategy for technology on a truly continental scale can create".

The Labour Government stressed that its "purpose derives above all from our conviction that Europe is now faced with the opportunity of a great move forward in political unity and that we can-and indeed we must-play our part in it". The statement went on to say that the Government intended 'to pursue our application for membership with all the vigour and determination at our command".

The negotiations succeed

 Both the Conservative and the Labour Governments were frustrated in their attempts to join the Community in the 1960s by a decision of the then French government. But on both occasions the government of the day did not withdraw Britain's application.

In May 1 970 the Labour Government declared that it intended to begin negotiations again as soon as possible. This intention was repeated by the new Conservative Government as soon as it took office in June 1970 and negotiations began on the last day of that month. Britain's negotiators then went forward on the lines prepared by the previous Labour Government.

 A year later, the British negotiator was able to announce that apart from fisheries, which is still to be negotiated, all the crucial issues had now been dealt with. The success of the negotiations makes it clear that it is now open to us to join the Community if we wish to.

Our Prospects

The Government believes that membership of the European Economic Community will enable Britain to achieve a higher standard of living. The Six have been able to do this themselves, Membership of the European Economic Community would provide the most favourable means of achieving the economic progress which we all desire and which has eluded us for so long.

Costs and benefits

Membership would not automatically improve our performance and we would be involved in costs as well as benefits, Prosperity in any country depends first and foremost upon the size and effective use of its resources and manpower, plant, equipment and managerial skill.

 For industry better opportunities once we are inside the Community will enable Britain to sell more and to produce more. As a result, we would increase our national wealth and so be able to improve our standard of living as well as meet the cost of entry. Given a minimum increase, by the end of five years our national income could be some £1,100 million a year higher. No firm estimate of the long~term industrial benefits can sensibly be made, but the Government is confident from the experience of the Six, that the effects of entry will be positive and substantial.

A larger market for trade and industry

Membership of the Community would mean that British manufacturers will be selling their products in a home market five times as large as at present. Trade amongst the Six has grown far faster than our exports to them, For advanced industrial countries like Britain large markets free from trade barriers can encourage a high level of investment in modern equipment and so offer the chance of new jobs.

Where real earnings are higher

In order to see what may happen if we join the Community we must look at the evidence provided by the experience of the Six over the past ten years or more. Within the Six, the Governments, industries and trade unions are all convinced that their progress has been promoted by the creation of the Community.

In 1958 people in Britain were earning, on the average, about as much as people in France, Germany and Holland, and well over half as much again as those in Italy.

By 1969 average earnings in Italy had caught up with British earnings, and in the other Community countries they were between a quarter and a half higher than in Britain.

Between 1958 and 1989 average earnings in Britain, after allowing for price inflation-that is, the real earnings-had increased by less than 40 per cent, while in the Community countries they had gone up on average by over 75 per cent.

If we join, and provided British industry takes its opportunities, wage earners will benefit from increased prosperity and their real wages should rise, as those of wage earners in the Six have done.  

INCREASE in average income per employed person in

real terms 1958-69  

(Click on image to enlarge)

 


The Community's farming policy  

When adopted by us, this common agricultural policy will stimulate British farm output and open Community markets to our food exports. But at the same time it will raise the cost of our food imports. The extent of this increase in costs will depend on the difference between Community and world food prices, which has been narrowing considerably in the last year or two. But if the present price gap were to continue the additional cost to our balance of payments on account of food imports is still not likely to be more than £5 million in the first year and £50 million a year by the end of five years.

Effect on food prices

On the same assumption about Community and world prices, it is expected that as a result of adopting the common agricultural policy the average rise in the housewife's food bill over the first five years will be about 2 & half p in the £ per year. This means the cost of living would increase by about a half P in the £ per year.

Growth of exports since 1958  

Price increases would vary for different foods. For example butter, cheese and beef prices are likely to rise more than the average, and bread, flour and eggs by about the average. Milk, fish, oils and fats, tea and coffee, should show little change. Some fruit and vegetable prices may be lower at certain times of the year.

The narrowing difference between world food prices and the Community's means that the effect on food prices in the shops after Britain joins the Community will not be as great as was once feared. In addition, tariff reductions should lead to lower prices for some manufactured goods,  

Our standard of living

Wage earners will benefit from the increased prosperity of British industry and their real wages should rise as those of wage earners in the Six.  

Retirement pensioners and those on other social benefits will be protected from the effect of food price increases in the shops that may be due to British entry. They will get adjustments of those social benefits, including supplementary benefits.

National insurance pensions and related benefits are already having their purchasing power maintained through regular reviews every two years. The next review will take place in 1 973, and the small effect on prices of joining the Community will not begin to be felt until the spring and summer of 1973. The Government promises that in these reviews both in 1 973 and afterwards full allowance will be made for the effect on prices of our joining the Community.

The National Health Service to the public will not in any way alter as a result of Britain's entry.

Our Own ldentity

Our own vital interests

Britain, inside the Community, will have every opportunity to make its views heard and its influence felt. When a government considers that vital national interests are involved, decisions are only made if all members agree.

No one nation can override another

There is no question of Britain losing essential national sovereignty; what is proposed is a sharing and an enlargement of individual national sovereignties in the common interest.

Our own way of life                        

The Six have not lost any of their national identities, national institutions and points of view. Nor will Britain. The Six have kept their own ways of life; any tourist knows that France and the French are no less French, Holland and the Dutch are no less Dutch, after years of Community life.

Our own Queen and Parliament

They have kept their own Monarchs and heads of State, their own governments, their own Parliaments, Courts and local authorities. So will Britain.

Our own laws

The English and Welsh and Scottish legal systems will continue as before, except that there will be certain changes under the treaties concerning economic and commercial matters. The British safeguards of habeas corpus and trial by jury will remain intact. So will the principle that a man is innocent until he has been proved guilty. Family law, nationality law, land law and the law of landlord and tenant will remain exactly the same. The common law will remain the basis of our legal system.

The Negotiations

A successful outcome  

All the main issues apart from fisheries were dealt with in the negotiations between Britain and the Communities.

Community institutions

An equal place and equal voting rights with France, Germany and Italy will be given to Britain.

English will be one of the official languages.

From now onwards until the time we join, the Community has promised that no decisions will be taken by it without consulting us. Britain will be able to influence decisions made by the Community in the interim period. Equally the British Government has undertaken similar obligations where the Community is affected.

Special arrangements

It has been agreed that we shall have five years in which to adjust ourselves to entry into the enlarged Community.

For industry we have secured the advantages of a single European market.  

All tariffs between Britain and the Six will be eliminated in five equal stages starting three months after we join. Within three years of our entry our exporters will have virtually duty free access into the market of the Six.

For our farmers we have made arrangements to provide for a gradual increase in market prices. Special provisions are being made for horticulture. These arrangements provide for a smooth transition for our farmers and growers with fair competition and stability.

The Government will be able to continue to help hill farmers maintain their income.

In general, British farmers can expect increasing prices and better returns for their produce despite higher feed costs. It is estimated that by the end of the five years, agricultural production in Britain will be 8 per cent greater than if we were not members of the Community.

The Community Budget

Every member contributes to the Community Budget. For the first five years the Community has agreed that our share of the total Community budget should rise gradually from 8'64 per cent in 1973 to 18'92 per cent in 1977. Only in 1977 will our share be broadly comparable to our economic size.                

Benefits from the Budget which will be paid to Britain have to be offset against the payments that we make towards it. This means that Britain will pay about £100 million to the Budget in the first year after entry, rising to some £200 million in 1977.

  Free movement of labour

Under the Community regulations nationals of one member country may enter another to look for or take up work. The Community as a whole has been regularly short of labour. The Six have attracted large numbers of workers from outside, while the movement of workers within the Six has diminished. When we join, the pattern is likely to be similar. Neither this Government nor the last asked for special safeguards in this respect.

For Northern Ireland the Government has asked for a special five-year period before the free movement of labour requirements apply. Further special measures may be needed after the five years.  

Fisheries

The arrangements for fishing have still to be settled. The Government is determined to secure proper safeguards for the British fishing industry. The Community has recognised the need to change its fisheries policy for an enlarged Community of Ten particularly in regard to access to fishing grounds.  

Regional development

As members of the Community we shall be able to deal more effectively with the problems of regional development, not least because of the new economic opportunities that will exist. The present members are pursuing regional policies on economic and social grounds similar to ours.

New Zealand

New Zealand will be assured access to the Community market for a substantial quantity of its current dairy exports to Britain. This will decrease only gradually, so that by the end of 1977 New Zealand will still have a guaranteed market for at least 71 per cent of its butter and cheese exports to Europe. This should give New Zealand earnings equal to or higher than she gets in the British market now.

Three years after our entry there will be a review of the arrangements for butter, and after that measures will be decided on to ensure the continuation of special arrangements beyond 1977. The New Zealand Government has described the arrangement as a whole as highly satisfactory.

Australia and Canada

Because they are highly industrialised it has been recognised since 1967 that no special arrangements would be necessary for Australia and Canada. But they will benefit from special agreements on certain industrial materials. If there is any abrupt disruption of trade in their farm products the Community has agreed to take speedy and effective action to deal with it.

Sugar

Britain's obligations to buy agreed quantities of sugar from the developing Commonwealth until the end of 1974 will be fulfilled. After that it is the firm declared purpose of the Community to safeguard the interests of these Commonwealth countries. The countries concerned have accepted this assurance.

Association  

The Community has offered Association to the independent developing Commonwealth countries in Africa, the Caribbean, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific so that their exports will be protected and enjoy access to Europe.

The Coal and Steel Community

If we join, there will be no interference with the size or status of the British Steel Corporation or the National Coal Board. Producers, consumers and workers will be represented on the Consultative Committee.

The Atomic Energy Community

We have accepted the Euratom treaty which is concerned with the peaceful uses of atomic energy, nuclear research and the spread of technical information.

copies of this booklet are available at post offices. Persons or organisations

requiring 10 copies or more should write to P0 Box 201, Mitcham, Surrey.

The Government White Paper: "The United Kingdom and the European Communities" (Cmnd. 471 5.) is obtainable through booksellers and from HMSO bookshops at the following addresses:

49 High Holborn. London wc1v 6HB                        50 Fairfax Street, Bristol 851 3DE

3a castle Street. Edinburgh EH2 3AR                     258 Broad Street. Birmingham B1 2HE

109 St. Mary Street. Cardiff cf1 1JW                        80 Chichester Street, Belfast BT1 4JY

Brazennose Street. Manchester M60 BAS

Issued by HM Government, July 1971. Design by the central Office of Information. Printed in England for HMSO by Sir Joseph Causton & Sons Ltd., London and Eastleigh.

The Opportunity

The price we shall have to pay for the economic and political advantages of joining the Community has been set out in this short version of the Government White Paper. These advantages will more than outweigh the costs, provided we seize the opportunities of the far wider home market now open to us.

Higher standards of living

If we do as the Six members of the Community have done, then we shall get a substantial increase in our trade and a stimulus to growth and investment. We shall also get a greater rise in real wages and standards of living than we have known for years or than would be possible if we remained outside.

The contrast between the experience of the Six in recent years and ours outside the Community shows that they chose the right road.

An influence in the world

We have grown accustomed to the political and military predominance in the world of the two super powers, the United States and Russia. In economic affairs the Community and Japan are well on their way to super power status. These giants will increasingly set the pattern of economic life.

If we join, we should have more opportunity and strength to influence events than we could possibly have on our own; if we do not join, the Community would continue to grow in strength without us. Our power to influence the Community would steadily diminish while the Community's power to influence us would as steadily increase.

Britain and Europe

Together we could tackle the problems of technological development which would be far too big for any one of us.

Together we could compete more effectively overseas.

Together we could help the poorer countries of the world more generously than if we were working on our own.

For the first time since the war a Europe united would have the means of recovering the position in the world which Europe divided has lost.

 

  <<PREVIOUS          NEXT >>        HOME        Top of Page